Statutory rape legal guidelines usually criminalize sexual exercise with a minor. Nonetheless, some jurisdictions acknowledge an exception, typically referred to colloquially by a specific theatrical title, that considers the relative ages of the contributors. In these circumstances, if each people are shut in age, prosecution could also be mitigated or averted fully. This exception sometimes applies when the older participant can also be a minor and inside a sure age vary of the youthful participant.
This provision goals to acknowledge that in some adolescent relationships, an influence imbalance that statutory rape legal guidelines intend to forestall will not be current. It acknowledges the developmental stage of youngsters and distinguishes conditions involving predatory adults from these the place each events are experiencing comparable ranges of maturity and understanding. Traditionally, the implementation of this idea has been debated, balancing the necessity to defend youngsters with the popularity of adolescent relationships.
The next sections will delve into the particular laws regarding sexual offenses and age of consent throughout the state, offering an in depth overview of the authorized framework and its utility.
1. Age proximity
The center of authorized exceptions regarding statutory offenses lies within the idea of age proximity. It is a recognition that the stark line drawn by age of consent can obscure the nuances of adolescent relationships the place real consent, although technically invalid beneath the legislation, could exist between people of comparable maturity.
-
Developmental Similarity
Age proximity suggests a better chance of shared emotional and mental growth. A sixteen-year-old and a seventeen-year-old could share comparable life experiences and decision-making capabilities in comparison with a sixteen-year-old and a twenty-five-year-old. This similarity turns into a consider figuring out if a dangerous energy imbalance existed.
-
Mitigation, Not Absolution
The presence of shut ages is just not an automated get-out-of-jail-free card. As an alternative, it gives a foundation for probably mitigating expenses or sentences. Prosecutors and judges contemplate the particular circumstances, together with the character of the interplay, the relative maturity ranges, and any proof of coercion or exploitation, earlier than making a willpower.
-
Defining the Boundaries
Establishing the particular age hole that qualifies for consideration is an important and infrequently debated side. Statutes sometimes outline an higher restrict on the age distinction. For instance, the legislation would possibly solely apply if the older particular person is not more than two or three years older than the youthful particular person. This restrict is meant to forestall exploitation whereas acknowledging adolescent relationships.
-
Burden of Proof
The duty sometimes falls on the defendant to exhibit that the age distinction was minimal and that the interplay was consensual, missing any factor of coercion or abuse. Proof of a wholesome, mutual relationship may be introduced, although will probably be scrutinized rigorously. This burden displays the underlying presumption that people beneath the age of consent are inherently susceptible.
Within the absence of clearly outlined legal guidelines, such relationships nonetheless fall beneath the scrutiny of the justice system, at the same time as such relationships stay topic to present statutory rape legal guidelines. Due to this fact, understanding the nuances of age proximity is essential to deciphering the appliance of authorized ideas to particular and infrequently difficult real-life situations.
2. Consent validity
The idea of consent, in authorized phrases, is the cornerstone upon which permissible interactions relaxation. Nonetheless, its utility turns into fraught with complexity when contemplating relationships involving minors, notably throughout the framework loosely described as “Romeo and Juliet” provisions. Whereas the presence of a “Romeo and Juliet” exception can mitigate statutory rape expenses based mostly on age proximity, the query of legitimate consent stays paramount, typically defining the trajectory of a case.
-
The Impossibility of True Consent
Legally, a person beneath the age of consent, no matter maturity or the character of the connection, can’t present consent within the eyes of the legislation. That is rooted within the understanding that minors lack the complete cognitive and emotional growth required to totally comprehend the implications of sexual exercise. Thus, even when each events are close to the age of consent, the legislation views the youthful participant as inherently incapable of providing legitimate consent.
-
The Phantasm of Equivalence
Romeo and Juliet provisions typically function beneath the idea {that a} smaller age hole implies a better diploma of equality within the relationship. This may create an phantasm that consent, although legally invalid, carries some weight. Nonetheless, the legislation nonetheless seeks to find out if coercion, manipulation, or any type of undue affect performed a job, even inside seemingly equitable age ranges. The main target shifts to the surroundings surrounding the interplay, assessing energy dynamics and vulnerabilities.
-
Burden of Proof and Due Diligence
The onus sometimes falls on the older particular person, even inside a “Romeo and Juliet” state of affairs, to exhibit that they took cheap steps to make sure the youthful particular person’s participation was fully voluntary and free from any stress. This requires an intensive examination of the connection’s historical past, the people’ respective circumstances, and any indicators of manipulation or abuse. Merely claiming that the connection was consensual is inadequate; proof of accountable and moral habits is critical.
-
The Ripple Impact on Reporting
The interaction of age proximity and consent can affect reporting charges of statutory offenses. Some victims could hesitate to report as a consequence of emotions of guilt, disgrace, or the assumption that their relationship, although technically unlawful, was not abusive. Conversely, others could also be inspired to come back ahead as a consequence of evolving understandings of consent and the popularity that even relationships with minimal age variations may be exploitative. This underscores the necessity for clear and accessible sources that educate people about consent and reporting choices.
In essence, whereas a “Romeo and Juliet” provision could reduce the severity of authorized repercussions, it by no means negates the significance of consent. It acts as a filter by which a extra nuanced examination of the connection is performed, emphasizing the necessity to stability safety of minors with a recognition of the realities of adolescent relationships. The presence or absence of real consent, even inside a small age hole, stays the pivotal determinant of culpability and justice.
3. Mitigating circumstances
Take into account a case in a small Kansas city. Two youngsters, Sarah and Michael, each seventeen, discovered themselves dealing with authorized complexities. Sarah, barely three months youthful than Michael, had engaged in a consensual intimate relationship with him. When found, the scenario triggered statutory considerations, initiating a authorized course of that threatened Michael with critical expenses. Nonetheless, the presence of mitigating circumstances provided a glimmer of hope throughout the authorized maze. These circumstancestheir near-identical ages, the voluntary nature of their involvement, and the absence of coercionbecame important components. The protection argued that labeling Michael a predator was a distortion of the truth, presenting proof of their shared emotional maturity and mutual respect.
The courtroom thought-about the intent behind the state’s age of consent legal guidelines: to guard susceptible minors from exploitation. In Sarah and Michaels case, the information painted a distinct pictureone of shared experiences and understanding. The choose acknowledged the dearth of malicious intent and the real bond between the 2. Mitigating circumstances allowed the choose to tailor the punishment to suit the crime, or, fairly, to acknowledge the nuanced nature of the alleged crime itself. As an alternative of a harsh sentence, Michael acquired probation and was required to attend counseling periods specializing in accountable relationships. This end result mirrored a stability between upholding the legislation and recognizing the distinctive context of the scenario.
The Sarah and Michael case illustrates the essence of mitigating circumstances throughout the framework. It serves as a reminder that justice is not blind adherence to the letter of the legislation, however a cautious consideration of particular person circumstances. These provisions provide an avenue for empathy and understanding inside a system designed to guard the susceptible, permitting for a extra simply and equitable end result when adolescent relationships brush towards authorized boundaries.
4. Statutory exceptions
The state’s statutes, supposed to guard susceptible minors, acknowledge a posh actuality: not all adolescent relationships warrant the complete drive of the legislation. These relationships may be topic to what are generally often called statutory exceptions, forming an important intersection within the authorized panorama.
-
Age Proximity Thresholds
These statutory exceptions sometimes outline a selected age hole inside which a relationship could also be thought-about in a different way. For instance, a legislation would possibly state that if the older occasion is not more than two years older than the youthful occasion, the potential penalties are decreased and even eradicated. This provision acknowledges that the ability dynamics current in a relationship between two seventeen-year-olds could also be considerably totally different from these in a relationship between a seventeen-year-old and an grownup. This threshold, nevertheless, varies throughout jurisdictions and displays societal perceptions of adolescent maturity and vulnerability. The brink should be fastidiously evaluated for its supposed results of safety.
-
Consent Validity Evaluation
Even throughout the bounds of those statutory exceptions, the difficulty of consent is paramount. Whereas the legislation could acknowledge the diminished culpability of the older occasion, it doesn’t robotically validate the youthful occasion’s consent. The courts could contemplate proof of coercion, manipulation, or undue affect, even when the age distinction falls throughout the acceptable vary. This evaluation acknowledges that even relationships between people of comparable age may be exploitative, and that the legislation’s major concern stays the safety of minors from hurt.
-
Discretionary Prosecution
Statutory exceptions typically grant prosecutors a level of discretion in deciding whether or not to pursue expenses. This discretion permits them to contemplate the totality of the circumstances, together with the character of the connection, the maturity ranges of the people concerned, and any proof of hurt. This prosecutorial discretion is just not unfettered; it should be exercised responsibly and in accordance with established authorized rules. It additionally highlights the subjectivity inherent in making use of legal guidelines, requiring prosecutors to make troublesome judgments in regards to the potential affect of a case on all events concerned.
-
Mitigation of Penalties
In circumstances the place prosecution proceeds, statutory exceptions could permit for a discount in penalties upon conviction. This may manifest as lighter sentences, probation as an alternative of imprisonment, or various sentencing choices similar to counseling or neighborhood service. The purpose is to deal with the particular circumstances of the case whereas nonetheless holding the older occasion accountable for his or her actions. This strategy acknowledges {that a} one-size-fits-all strategy to sentencing will not be acceptable when coping with adolescent relationships, and {that a} extra nuanced response can higher serve the pursuits of justice.
The existence of statutory exceptions acknowledges that the state’s relationship with its residents is multifaceted and aware of circumstances. Whereas such legal guidelines search to offer some measure of fairness, additionally they create the area for extra challenges and better want for understanding the specifics of those guidelines.
5. Prison culpability
Prison culpability, the measure of blameworthiness assigned to a person for a criminal offense, stands as a central level throughout the nuanced utility of exceptions. The very existence of such legal guidelines acknowledges that the usual definition of statutory rape may not precisely replicate the ethical or moral gravity of sure adolescent relationships. Culpability is just not merely a binary state; it exists on a spectrum. The legislation seeks to discern the place on that spectrum a person falls when an age-of-consent transgression happens between people who’re shut in age.
Take into account two hypothetical situations. In a single, a 17-year-old knowingly engages in a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old, absolutely conscious of the age distinction and the inherent authorized threat, even perhaps exploiting a place of emotional or social affect. Within the second state of affairs, two 17-year-olds, separated by mere months, enter right into a consensual relationship, each appearing with what they understand as mature understanding. Whereas each conditions technically violate statutory rape legal guidelines, the diploma of prison culpability differs considerably. A legislation serves as a software to calibrate the authorized response, probably lowering or eliminating expenses within the latter state of affairs based mostly on components like age proximity, consent, and the absence of exploitative habits. With out consideration of culpability, a blunt utility of the legislation dangers unjustly branding adolescents as predatory offenders.
The problem, nevertheless, lies in persistently and pretty assessing culpability. There aren’t any straightforward formulation or goal measures. As an alternative, prosecutors, judges, and juries should grapple with subjective components, weighing the proof, contemplating the people’ maturity ranges, and assessing the presence of coercion or undue affect. This course of is inherently susceptible to biases and inconsistencies. But, the popularity that culpability exists on a spectrum, and that sure adolescent relationships deserve a extra nuanced authorized response, stays an important element of a simply authorized system. By fastidiously evaluating culpability, the system goals to stability the safety of susceptible minors with the avoidance of unjustly punishing adolescents who could have made poor decisions however don’t pose a real risk.
6. Age discrepancies
The quiet fields of Kansas, typically related to conventional values, belie a complexity mirrored in its authorized system in the case of the fragile matter of youthful relationships. On the coronary heart of this complexity lies the query of age discrepancies, a important factor in figuring out the appliance of legal guidelines that contemplate the romantic, but legally precarious, liaisons paying homage to Shakespeare’s star-crossed lovers.
-
The Letter and the Spirit
Statutory rape legal guidelines, designed to guard minors, draw a agency line based mostly on age. Nonetheless, exceptions acknowledge {that a} strict adherence to the letter of the legislation can typically contradict its spirit. Age discrepancies dictate whether or not the legislation views a relationship as exploitative and predatory, or as a youthful indiscretion with probably mitigating circumstances. The distinction of some months, or perhaps a yr, may be the distinction between a felony conviction and an opportunity at rehabilitation.
-
The Shifting Sands of Maturity
The legislation acknowledges that maturity is just not a set attribute tied strictly to a quantity. A seventeen-year-old on the cusp of maturity could possess a stage of maturity and understanding far exceeding that of a sixteen-year-old, and even some adults. Age discrepancies inside a slim band immediate authorized scrutiny, forcing courts to evaluate the people concerned, their emotional growth, and the dynamics of their relationship. Did a real connection exist, or was one occasion unduly influenced by the opposite?
-
The Weight of Energy Dynamics
Age discrepancies, even seemingly minor ones, can trace at imbalances of energy. An older teenager, even throughout the boundaries of a statutory exception, could wield a stage of affect over a youthful accomplice, notably if there are disparities in social standing, emotional stability, or life experiences. The legislation seeks to find out if this affect was exerted to use or manipulate the youthful accomplice, undermining any declare of mutual consent. The absence of such exploitation is essential to the appliance of lenient consideration.
-
The Calculus of Culpability
In the end, age discrepancies are a important consider assessing prison culpability. The smaller the age distinction, the extra seemingly it’s that the authorized system will contemplate mitigating circumstances, similar to real consent and the absence of predatory intent. Nonetheless, even in circumstances the place the age discrepancy is minimal, the burden rests on the older occasion to exhibit that the connection was not exploitative and that the youthful occasion’s participation was voluntary and knowledgeable. This calculus of culpability weighs closely on the scales of justice, figuring out the destiny of younger lives caught between the calls for of the legislation and the complexities of youthful want.
The appliance of legal guidelines contemplating relationships in Kansas reveals the continued rigidity between the will to guard susceptible minors and the popularity that adolescence is a interval of complicated feelings and evolving relationships. Age discrepancies function an important lens by which the authorized system makes an attempt to navigate this troublesome terrain, balancing justice, compassion, and the distinctive circumstances of every case.
7. Energy dynamics
The Kansas plains stretch extensive, mirroring the broad expanse of authorized interpretation wanted when contemplating youthful relationships colliding with statutory boundaries. Inside this panorama, the specter of energy dynamics rises, casting a protracted shadow over the applicability of exceptions typically invoked in such circumstances. The legislation, whereas looking for to acknowledge youthful indiscretions, should first grapple with the refined and overt methods during which affect can warp a seemingly consensual encounter.
-
The Delicate Hand of Affect
Even when age discrepancies are minimal, the social panorama of adolescence can create vital energy imbalances. A preferred pupil, athlete, or somebody with better monetary sources can exert undue affect over a much less assured or much less privileged peer. This affect will not be explicitly coercive, however the stress to evolve, to realize acceptance, or to keep away from social ostracization can subtly compromise free will. The legislation struggles to detect these nuances, relying as an alternative on outward appearances of consent, typically lacking the underlying currents of management.
-
The Exploitation of Vulnerability
Trauma, psychological well being challenges, or unstable dwelling environments can amplify a teen’s vulnerability, making them extra inclined to manipulation. An older particular person, even one simply barely older, can exploit these vulnerabilities, making a dependency that clouds judgment and undermines the power to make really unbiased decisions. The legislation, in its quest for goal proof, typically overlooks the subjective experiences of the susceptible, failing to totally account for the methods during which their previous traumas or current struggles form their perceptions and choices.
-
The Phantasm of Equality
Exceptions typically function beneath the idea {that a} smaller age hole implies better equality within the relationship. Nonetheless, this could be a harmful phantasm. Even inside a slim age vary, one particular person could possess better emotional maturity, life expertise, or social savvy, giving them an unfair benefit. This benefit may be refined, manifesting within the type of refined emotional manipulation, guilt-tripping, or the exploitation of insecurities. The legislation should look past the floor of equality, delving into the intricacies of the connection to unearth any indicators of undue affect.
-
The Lengthy Shadow of Authority
Relationships that start on-line, throughout geographical boundaries, or between people from vastly totally different cultural backgrounds are notably inclined to energy imbalances. The older particular person could wield the ability of information, expertise, or cultural norms to exert management over the youthful, much less skilled occasion. This type of affect may be particularly troublesome to detect, because it typically operates inside a framework of perceived authority, the place the youthful particular person defers to the older one out of respect or a way of inferiority. The legislation should be vigilant in recognizing these hidden energy dynamics, notably in an more and more interconnected world.
In the end, the appliance of exceptions inside Kansas hinges on a cautious and compassionate evaluation of energy dynamics. It requires a willingness to look past the floor of consent, to contemplate the social, emotional, and psychological components that may compromise free will. With out such scrutiny, the legislation dangers perpetuating injustice, failing to guard the very people it seeks to safeguard from exploitation.
8. Adolescent relationships
The rolling wheat fields of Kansas, typically a logo of idyllic American life, conceal a authorized panorama that grapples with the complexities of adolescent relationships. These relationships, charged with the depth of old flame and the recklessness of youthful exploration, change into entangled with statutory legislation, giving rise to a localized interpretation typically likened to a Shakespearian tragedy. When two youngsters, barely out of childhood, discover themselves on the unsuitable aspect of the age of consent, the query arises: Is that this a case of exploitation, or a youthful indiscretion deserving of a extra nuanced understanding? The reply lies within the intricate dance between adolescent relationships and authorized statutes.
Take into account the case of two highschool college students, Emily and Jake. Emily, sixteen, met seventeen-year-old Jake at a summer time camp. Their connection was instant and intense. Their relationship, although consensual, violated the state’s age of consent legal guidelines. The prosecution, confronted with the letter of the legislation, thought-about urgent expenses. Nonetheless, the protection argued that their relationship, characterised by mutual affection and a minimal age hole, warranted consideration. The courtroom, guided by the rules meant to contemplate mitigating components in adolescent relationships, fastidiously reviewed the information. It thought-about their maturity ranges, their shared social circles, and the absence of any proof of coercion. This lens, formed by the understanding that youngsters function inside a definite social and emotional realm, allowed the courtroom to deviate from a inflexible utility of the statute. Emily and Jake’s story underscores the pivotal function of understanding adolescent relationships in shaping the appliance of the exception.
The sensible significance of understanding this connection is far-reaching. It ensures that the authorized system doesn’t unduly punish youngsters for what could also be real, albeit legally precarious, connections. It forces a deeper examination of the ability dynamics inside these relationships, shifting past easy age calculations to contemplate emotional maturity, social pressures, and particular person vulnerabilities. By acknowledging the distinctive challenges and traits of adolescent relationships, the authorized system in Kansas strives to strike a stability between defending susceptible minors and recognizing the complexities of rising up in a world the place love, legislation, and youthful indiscretion typically collide. This nuanced strategy, nevertheless, requires ongoing dialogue, schooling, and a willingness to adapt authorized interpretations to the ever-evolving panorama of adolescent experiences.
Regularly Requested Questions Relating to Statutory Exceptions in Kansas
The next addresses widespread misconceptions and considerations surrounding nuanced authorized issues in particular circumstances, offering factual perception for a clearer understanding of the authorized framework.
Query 1: Does this imply statutory rape legal guidelines are primarily nullified if each events are youngsters?
The concept of an entire abolishment of statutory rape legal guidelines is a standard, however vital, misunderstanding. The legal guidelines usually are not utterly disregarded. The idea, at its core, merely introduces a risk for decreased or dismissed expenses when people of comparable age interact in consensual acts. The State maintains its place that minors can’t legally consent to sexual exercise, and as such, these incidents require scrutiny.
Query 2: What is taken into account “shut in age?” Is there a selected age vary outlined?
The definition of “shut in age” is just not arbitrary. In jurisdictions the place such exceptions exist, particular tips dictate the age hole thought-about minimal sufficient to warrant consideration. This vary typically varies however usually is confined to a span of 1 to 3 years. The courtroom analyzes these metrics fastidiously.
Query 3: Does the exception robotically apply if the age distinction is throughout the acceptable vary?
This can be a frequent supply of confusion. Merely assembly the age standards doesn’t assure immunity from prosecution. The courts delve into the connection’s dynamic, evaluating components similar to coercion, manipulation, or abuse. If the prosecution identifies these parts, the exception turns into irrelevant.
Query 4: What occurs if one of many people concerned regrets the encounter later?
Subsequent remorse from both occasion would not retroactively negate the preliminary circumstances. If the encounter was genuinely consensual on the time, any later change of coronary heart would not robotically rework the act into a criminal offense. Nonetheless, any proof of coercion, manipulation, or drive can affect the case. The State should proceed contemplating many factors.
Query 5: If an grownup encourages two minors to interact in sexual exercise, does the exception defend the minors concerned?
The concept the exception extends to guard minors concerned is an enormous overstatement. The existence of exterior grownup encouragement essentially alters the state of affairs. In such circumstances, the main target shifts to the grownup’s function, probably dealing with expenses of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, or much more critical offenses. The preliminary minors usually are not as secure from these expenses as some could imagine.
Query 6: The place can somebody discover official documentation outlining particular state legal guidelines and their interpretations?
Accessing major sources is essential for clear perception. Authorized professionals, legislation libraries, and official authorities web sites provide invaluable sources. Session with a certified legal professional is crucial for customized authorized recommendation, as generalized data can’t tackle the complexities of particular person circumstances. Due to this fact, the reader is inspired to hunt out stated counsel.
Understanding such components includes cautious evaluation. These components needs to be considered when analyzing the potential results of those legal guidelines.
Subsequent, the article will flip to extra matters, providing a full and full image.
Navigating Authorized Waters
The confluence of youthful indiscretion and authorized consequence necessitates a cautious strategy. In a state the place youthful hearts and authorized boundaries intertwine, information turns into essentially the most potent protection. The tales whispered in courtrooms and etched in authorized paperwork paint a transparent image: understanding safeguards each innocence and ignorance.
Tip 1: Acknowledge the Immutable Line: Age of Consent
In Kansas, this line stands agency. No matter perceived maturity or emotional connection, partaking in sexual exercise with somebody beneath the age of consent carries authorized threat. This understanding varieties the bedrock of accountable decision-making.
Tip 2: Age Proximity Does Not Equal Absolution
The existence of statutory exceptions shouldn’t be misinterpreted as a free move. The courts meticulously look at the circumstances, probing for proof of coercion, manipulation, or undue affect. Age proximity merely opens the door for a extra nuanced analysis; it doesn’t assure immunity.
Tip 3: Consent Should Be Unfettered and Voluntary
The idea of consent transcends mere acquiescence. It requires real understanding, a freedom from stress, and an absence of exploitation. Affect, whether or not overt or refined, can invalidate consent, even inside a close-age relationship.
Tip 4: Energy Dynamics Demand Scrutiny
Adolescent relationships are hardly ever equitable. Disparities in social standing, emotional maturity, or life expertise can create energy imbalances that compromise free will. Be aware of these dynamics and act with a way of moral duty.
Tip 5: Search Counsel, Not Assumptions
Navigating authorized complexities requires experience. If confronted with a scenario involving potential violations, seek the advice of a certified legal professional. Authorized professionals can present customized steering, guaranteeing knowledgeable choices that align with authorized rules.
Tip 6: Documentation and Transparency are Key
Ought to a scenario come up that pulls authorized scrutiny, complete documentation proves invaluable. Protect correspondence, information of interactions, and any proof that helps the declare of consent and absence of coercion. The clearer the document, the higher the understanding.
Tip 7: Training is Paramount for Adolescents
Proactive schooling varieties the bedrock of hurt prevention. Equip the youthful technology with sources concerning consent, relationship energy dynamics, and authorized dangers. Knowledgeable decision-making is the important thing to stopping regrettable, life-altering conditions.
These are instruments designed to assist. By respecting the established boundaries and understanding the nuances of authorized interpretations, people can navigate the complexities of youthful relationships with better readability and a stronger moral compass.
The exploration of particular interpretations sheds gentle. The following part gives extra insights.
The Weight of Alternative
The exploration of exceptions in Kansas reveals a authorized tightrope, one stretched between the safety of susceptible youth and the acknowledgement of adolescent complexities. The presence of statutes designed to acknowledge age proximity, consent validity, and mitigating circumstances presents a double-edged sword. These legal guidelines present a pathway to nuanced justice, however concurrently invite confusion and potential for misinterpretation. Age discrepancies, energy dynamics, and the very nature of adolescent relationships all weigh closely on the scales when a youthful indiscretion crosses the authorized line. These parts serve to remind of each the dangers and rewards of relationships.
The teachings from courtrooms resonate far past authorized transcripts. They echo within the conversations households have, the schooling offered in faculties, and the choices made by younger individuals navigating the turbulent waters of affection and attraction. The exploration highlights the burden of non-public selection and the enduring want for accountable habits. The appliance of “romeo and juliet legislation in kansas”, due to this fact, calls for continued vigilance, schooling, and a dedication to upholding each the spirit and the letter of the legislation, guaranteeing equity, justice, and safety for all these touched by its attain. The pursuit of justice continues with each selection made.
